| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-02T16:42:32Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-08-02T16:42:32Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2017] ZACC 28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (1) BCLR 19 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (6) SA 646 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34548 | |
| dc.title | Snyders NO as Trustee of The Louis Snyders Familie Trust v Louistef (Pty) Ltd and Another | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT311/16 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT311/16 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | The Court | |
| dc.date.judgment | 3 August 2017 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34548/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%203%20August%202017.pdf?sequence=22&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Petroleum Products Amendment Act 58 of 2003 — legal nature of site licences under section 2D — licence is asset, but subject to constraint | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal against the decision by the SCA to reverse the order by the High Court declaring null and void the sale of a site licence issued under the Petroleum Products Amendment Act 58 of 2003: Louistef (Pty) Ltd v Snyders [2016] ZASCA 182; 2016 JDR 2225 (SCA). The Pretoria High Court judgment is: Snyders NO v Louistef (Pty) Ltd 2016 (1) SA 123 (GP). |