Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-31T09:55:24Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-31T09:55:24Z
dc.identifier.citation [2018] ZACC 13
dc.identifier.citation (2018) 39 ILJ 1503 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2018 (8) BCLR 951 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2018 (5) SA 78 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation [2018] 8 BLLR 735 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34536
dc.title Rustenburg Platinum Mine v SAEWA obo Bester and Others en_US
dc.title.alternative CCT127/17
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT127/17 en_US
dc.date.hearing 9 November 2017
dc.contributor.judge Theron J
dc.date.judgment 17 May 2018
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34536/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2017%20May%202018.pdf?sequence=36&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Referring to a fellow employee as a “swart man” — test for whether words are derogatory and racist is objective — starting point must take into account the history of apartheid Lack of remorse and no acknowledgment of wrongdoing — no possibility of rehabilitation — dismissal is an appropriate sanction
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the Labour Appeal Court: SAEWA obo Bester v Rustenburg Platinum Mine and Another (JA45/16) [2017] ZALAC 23; (2017) 38 ILJ 1779 (LAC); [2017] 8 BLLR 764 (LAC) (3 May 2017). The case was previously heard in the Johannesburg Labour Court: Rustenburg Platinum Mine v SAEWA obo Bester and Others (JR130/14) [2016] ZALCJHB 75 (26 January 2016).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account