Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-06-29T12:31:24Z
dc.date.available 2017-06-29T12:31:24Z
dc.identifier.citation [2017] ZACC 23
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (5) SA 370 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (10) BCLR 1325 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34465
dc.title Swart v Starbuck and Others en_US
dc.title.alternative CCT153/16
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT153/16
dc.contributor.judge Khampepe J Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge Jafta J dissenting judgment
dc.contributor.judge Zondo J separate judgment
dc.date.judgment 29 June 2017
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34465/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2029%20June%202017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 — section 82(8) — claim by insolvent for the payment of damages — leave to appeal Uniform Rules of Court — rule 53 — condonation — constitutional challenge — judicial review
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for condonation and leave to appeal. The applicant seeks leave to appeal against the dismissal of his appeal by the SCA, including the order on costs. In the SCA the applicant appealed the order of the Pretoria High Court: Swart v Starbuck, unreported judgment Case No 48444/2008 (3 December 2013). The Pretoria High Court dismissed the applicant’s claim for damages under section 82(8) of the Insolvency Act).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account