| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:08:02Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:08:02Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2007-03-05 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2007] ZACC 14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2007 (9) BCLR 919 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2007 (5) SA 620 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3179 | |
| dc.title | Shilubana and Others v Nwamitwa (National Movement of Rural Women and Commission for Gender Equality as Amici Curiae) | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT3/07 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT3/07 | en |
| dc.contributor.judge | Van der Westhuizen J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 17 May 2007 ; Reasons furnished on 8 June 2007 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3179/Full%20judgment%204%20June%202008%20Oficial%20version%20%28161%20Kb%29-12529.pdf?sequence=35&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | This matter concerns a dispute for the right to succeed as Hosi (chief) of the Valoyi tribe in Limpopo. The applicants had applied for leave to appeal against a decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal. A day before the matter was due to be heard by this Court, the respondent gave notice that he intended to apply for postponement. The Court granted a postponement and issued directions in regard to the lodging of supplementary written argument. Majority: Van der Westhuizen J (unanimous). | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal against a decision of the SCA reported as Shilubana and Others v Nwamitwa (Commission for Gender Equality as Amicus Curiae) 2007 (2) SA 432 (SCA). The case was first heard in the Pretoria HIgh Court and reported as Nwamitwa v Phillia and Others 2005 (3) SA 536 (T). |