| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:06:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:06:35Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2006-06-01 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2007 (2) SA 531 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2007 (2) BCLR 111 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2922 | |
| dc.title | Concerned Land Claimants' Organisation of Port Elizabeth v Port Elizabeth Land and Community Restoration Association and | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT29/06 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT29/06 | en |
| dc.contributor.judge | The Court | |
| dc.date.judgment | 21 September 2006 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2922/Full%20judgment%20%28116%20Kb%29-8014.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | The applicant is a breakaway group from a group of people who had been previously dispossessed and who had entered into an agreement with the respondents for the restitution of their land. The applicant was unhappy with the terms of the agreement as it felt that the agreement did not give sufficient land to those who had been dispossessed. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed without hearing oral argument as it was not in the interests of justice for the matter to be heard. |