| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:06:32Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:06:32Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2006-05-22 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2006 (8) BCLR 869 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2911 | |
| dc.title | Du Toit v Seria | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT18/06 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT18/06 | en |
| dc.contributor.judge | The Court | |
| dc.date.judgment | 23 May 2006 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2911/Full%20judgment%20%2821.4%20Kb%29-6773.pdf?sequence=10&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | This case arose from an application arising from a Muslim marriage where the marriage had been terminated according to Muslim law. The parties had not concluded a civil marriage. The applicant argued that a common law universal partnership had existed between the parties during the subsistence of the Muslim marriage and therefore that she was entitled to half of the property owned by her former husband. Application dismissed on the grounds that it was not in the interests of justice to hear the application. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application to Constitutional Court for leave to appeal against a judgment and order of the Cape High Court made on 5 February 2004. On 20 July 2004 the Supreme Court of Appeal refused without reasons an application for leave to appeal against the decision of the Cape High Court. |