| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:06:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:06:25Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2006-03-30 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2006 (6) SA 103 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2006 (6) BCLR 669 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2869 | |
| dc.title | Campus Law Clinic (University of KwaZulu-Natal Durban) v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd and Another | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT1/06 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT1/06 | en |
| dc.contributor.judge | The Court | |
| dc.date.judgment | 31 March 2006 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2869/Full%20Judgment-6186.pdf?sequence=7&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Applicants brought application in the public interests for leave to appeal against a judgment of the SCA ; a matter to which they were not party to. Court dismissed the applications and held that though the applicants had the requisite standing; new constitutional issues had been raised. Interests of justice require that matter is dealt with comprehensively. Applicants must begin case anew in lower courts. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | This case was originally heard in the Cape High Court, which was taken on appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal. This is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment and order of the Supreme Court of Appeal: Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Saunderson and Others, SCA Case 358/05, 15 December 2005, unreported. The applicant applies in the alternative for direct access to the Constitutional Court. |