Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:04:55Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:04:55Z
dc.date.created 2006-02-20 en
dc.identifier.citation [2007] ZACC 6
dc.identifier.citation 2007 (5) SA 250 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2007 (7) BCLR 751 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2525
dc.title NM and Others v Smith and Others (Freedom of Expression Institute as Amicus Curiae) en
dc.title.alternative CCT69/05 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT69/05 en
dc.contributor.judge Madala J Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge Langa CJ separate judgment
dc.contributor.judge Sachs J separate judgment
dc.contributor.judge O'Regan J dissenting judgment
dc.date.judgment 4 April 2007
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2525/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28529%20Kb%29-11070.pdf?sequence=20&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Application challenging a High Court decision that the disclosure of the names and HIV status of three HIV positive women in a university report did not give rise to a claim based on the actio injuriarum. The appeal was upheld. The Court differed on the facts as to whether the respondents had been shown to have acted intentionally and on the question whether the actio injuriarum should be developed. Majority: Madala J (concurring Moseneke DCJ, Mokgoro J, Ngcobo J,Nkabinde J, van der Westhuizen J, Yacoob J.) Separate Concurrence: Langa CJ, Sachs J. Dissent: O' Regan J.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account