Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:04:53Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:04:53Z
dc.date.created 2006-02-14 en
dc.identifier.citation [2007] ZACC 5
dc.identifier.citation 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2007 (7) BCLR 691 (CC
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2513
dc.title Barkhuizen v Napier en
dc.title.alternative CCT72/05 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT72/05 en
dc.contributor.judge Ngcobo J Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge Moseneke DCJ dissenting judgment Sachs J dissenting judgment
dc.contributor.judge Langa CJ separate judgment O'Regan J separate judgment
dc.date.judgment 4 April 2007
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2513/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28572%20Kb%29-11056.pdf?sequence=14&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Constitutional challenge under section 34 to a time limitation clause in a short-term insurance contract requiring the applicant to institute court proceedings within 90 days.The clause was held not to be unconstitutional or contrary to public policy. Majority: Ngcobo J (concurring Madala J, Nkabinde J, Skweyiya J, Van der Westhuizen J and Yacoob J) Separate Concurrences: O'Regan J, Langa CJ Dissents: Sachs J, Moseneke DCJ (concurring Mokgoro J)
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal to the Constitutional Court against a decision of the SCA, reported as Napier v Barkhuizen 2006 (4) SA 1 (SCA); 2006 (9) BCLR 1011 (SCA).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account