Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:04:38Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:04:38Z
dc.date.created 2005-11-22 en
dc.identifier.citation 2007 (1) SA 343 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2450
dc.title AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another en
dc.title.alternative CCT51/05 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT51/05 en
dc.contributor.judge Yacoob J Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge Langa CJ dissenting judgment
dc.contributor.judge O'Regan J separate judgment
dc.date.judgment 28 July 2006
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2450/Full%20judgment%20%28524%20Kb%29-7526.pdf?sequence=17&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Writing for the majority Yacoob J held that public power may be exercised by a private body. When such power is exercised, it is always subject to the rule of law and the doctrine of legality. In determining whether the authority to exercise public power by a private body is properly delegated, regard must be had to what powers would be necessary for the private body to perform its functions properly. Majority judgment written by Yacoob J. O'Regan concurred in separate judgment. Langa CJ wrote a dissenting judgment.
dc.concourt.casehistory This case was first heard in the Pretoria High Court: AAA Investments (Pty) Ltd v Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another 2004 (6) SA 557 (T) and later in the Supreme Court of Appeal: Micro Finance Regulatory Council v AAA Investments (Pty) Ltd and Another 2006 (1) SA 27 (SCA) which reversed the Pretoria High Court order. This is an application for leave to appeal against the Supreme Court of Appeal judgment.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account