| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:04:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:04:38Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2005-11-22 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2007 (1) SA 343 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2450 | |
| dc.title | AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT51/05 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT51/05 | en |
| dc.contributor.judge | Yacoob J Majority judgment | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Langa CJ dissenting judgment | |
| dc.contributor.judge | O'Regan J separate judgment | |
| dc.date.judgment | 28 July 2006 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2450/Full%20judgment%20%28524%20Kb%29-7526.pdf?sequence=17&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Writing for the majority Yacoob J held that public power may be exercised by a private body. When such power is exercised, it is always subject to the rule of law and the doctrine of legality. In determining whether the authority to exercise public power by a private body is properly delegated, regard must be had to what powers would be necessary for the private body to perform its functions properly. Majority judgment written by Yacoob J. O'Regan concurred in separate judgment. Langa CJ wrote a dissenting judgment. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | This case was first heard in the Pretoria High Court: AAA Investments (Pty) Ltd v Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another 2004 (6) SA 557 (T) and later in the Supreme Court of Appeal: Micro Finance Regulatory Council v AAA Investments (Pty) Ltd and Another 2006 (1) SA 27 (SCA) which reversed the Pretoria High Court order. This is an application for leave to appeal against the Supreme Court of Appeal judgment. |