Phumelela Gaming and Leisure Limited v Grundlingh and Others

dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-08T17:04:13Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-08T17:04:13Z
dc.date.created	2005-09-05	en
dc.identifier.citation	2006 (8) BCLR 883 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2354
dc.title	Phumelela Gaming and Leisure Limited v Grundlingh and Others	en
dc.title.alternative	CCT31/05	en
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT31/05	en
dc.contributor.judge	Langa CJ
dc.date.judgment	18 May 2006
dc.link.judgment	http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2354/Full%20judgment%20%28137%20Kb%29-6775.pdf?sequence=10&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis	This case sought to involve a delictual claim by a totalisator against bookmakers on the ground that the use of the totalisator's dividends amounted to unlawful competition. In a unanimous judgment Langa CJ held that there was no need to develop the test of unlawful competition in terms of s. 39(2) of the Constitution.
dc.concourt.casehistory	This case was first heard in the Pretoria High Court and subsequently on appeal by the Supreme Court of Appeal. This is an appeal to the Constitutional Court against the judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal. The applicant also applies for direct access to the Constitutional Court to enable it to challenge the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the National Gambling Act 7 of 2004.

Files in this item

Directions by the Chief Justice-4516.pdf ( 29.22Kb )

Respondent's Heads of Argument SCA-4521.pdf ( 81.61Kb )

Respondent's Supplementary Heads of Argument SCA-4522.pdf ( 68.07Kb )

Notice of Motion-4519.pdf ( 26.08Kb )

Founding Affidavit-4520.pdf ( 120.4Kb )

Fourth Respondent's Answering Affidavit-4862.pdf ( 36.49Kb )

Pre-hearing summary-6585.pdf ( 16.15Kb )

Supreme Court of Appeal judgment-4518.pdf ( 114.2Kb )

Summary of judgment-6583.pdf ( 35.15Kb )

Full judgment (137 Kb)-6775.pdf ( 136.8Kb )