Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:02:10Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:02:10Z
dc.date.created 2003-12-02 en
dc.identifier.citation 2003 (5) SA 281 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2003 (8) BCLR 838 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2189
dc.title Minister of Home Affairs v Eisenberg & Associates In re: Eisenberg & Associates v Minister of Home Affairs and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT15/03 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT15/03 en
dc.contributor.judge Chaskalson CJ
dc.date.judgment 27 June 2003
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2189/Full%20judgment%20%28334%20Kb%29-865.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Chaskalson CJ writing judgment for the unanimous Court found that the regulations promulgated in terms of section 52 of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002 were not subject to section 7 of the sane Act, because the Act did not specify such a condition. Further, it was found that the Minister complied with requirements set out in section 4 of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, which deals with administrative action affecting the public, upheld the appeal.
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal and appeal from a decision of Cape High Court: Eisenberg & Associates v Minister of Home Affairs and Others 2003 (5) BCLR 514 (C).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account