Xinwa and Others v Volkswagen of South Africa (Pty) Ltd

dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-08T17:02:05Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-08T17:02:05Z
dc.date.created	2003-06-04	en
dc.identifier.citation	[2003] ZACC 7
dc.identifier.citation	2003 (6) BCLR 575 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	2003 (4) SA 390 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	[2003] 5 BLLR 409 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2175
dc.title	Xinwa and Others v Volkswagen of South Africa (Pty) Ltd	en
dc.title.alternative	CCT3/03	en
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT3/03	en
dc.contributor.judge	The Court
dc.date.judgment	4 April 2003
dc.link.judgment	http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2175/Full%20judgment%20%28144%20Kb%29-13325.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis	Unanimous judgment of the Court. The matter was dealt with summarily under Rule 18(10)(b). The facts indicate that the dismissal of the workers was not procedurally unfair and therefore leave to appeal was denied.
dc.concourt.casehistory	Employees were dismissed from their employment at Volkswagen factory after refusing to work and failing to comply with an ultimatum to return to work. Facts appear in the case of the CCMA: Mzeku and Others v Volkswagen SA (Pty) Ltd (2001) 22 ILJ 771 (CCMA); Labour Court on review: Volkswagen SA (Pty) Ltd v Brand NO and Others (2001) 22 ILJ 993 (LC) ; [2001] 5 BLLR 558 (LC), and then the Labour Appeal Court: Mzeku and Others v Volkswagen SA (Pty) Ltd and Others (2001) 22 ILJ 1575 (LAC) ; [2001] 8 BCLR 857 (LAC).

Files in this item

Full judgment (144 Kb)-13325.pdf ( 67.41Kb )

Full judgment (144 Kb)-17488.pdf ( 144.1Kb )

Full judgment Official version (144Kb)-17489.pdf ( 144.1Kb )