dc.date.accessioned |
2017-04-08T17:01:31Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-04-08T17:01:31Z |
|
dc.date.created |
2003-10-09 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
[2003] ZACC 8 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
2003 (8) BCLR 825 (CC) |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
2003 (4) SA 584 (CC) |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2167 |
|
dc.title |
Ingledew v Financial Services Board: In re Financial Services Board v Van der Merwe and Another |
en |
dc.title.alternative |
CCT6/02 |
en |
dc.identifier.casenumber |
CCT6/02 |
en |
dc.date.hearing |
18 February 2003 |
|
dc.contributor.judge |
Ngcobo J |
|
dc.date.judgment |
13 May 2003 |
|
dc.link.judgment |
http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2167/Full%20judgment%20%28213%20Kb%29-2347.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y |
|
dc.concourt.synopsis |
Unanimous judgment by Ngcobo J. The applicant argued that s 32 of the Constitution (right of access to information) should give him access to the record of investigation when he was sued by the Financial Services Board under the Insider Trading Act of 1998. The Court found it was not in the interests of justice to grant the application for leave to appeal because the applicant will not be prejudiced if he did not get the information required at this stage of the proceedings. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed. |
|
dc.concourt.casehistory |
Application for leave to appeal against the decision of the Pretoria High Court dismissing an interlocutory application by NM Ingledew. |
|