Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:01:29Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:01:29Z
dc.date.created 2003-11-19 en
dc.identifier.citation [2003] ZACC 2
dc.identifier.citation 2003 (4) SA 266 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2004 (1) BCLR 1 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2162
dc.title Satchwell v President of the Republic of South Africa and Another en
dc.title.alternative CCT48/02 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT48/02 en
dc.date.hearing 11 March 2003
dc.contributor.judge O'Regan J
dc.date.judgment 17 March 2003
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2162/Full%20judgment%20%28181%20Kb%29-20765.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Unanimous judgment of O'Regan J. Direct access granted. Applicant had obtained a previous order of constitutional invalidity of regulations of the Judges' Remuneration and Conditions of Employment Act 88 of 1989. However these regulations were replaced by new regulations which were substantially the same. The court ordered that the words "or partner in a permanent same-sex life partnership in which the partners have undertaken reciprocal duties of support" be read into the regulations.
dc.concourt.casehistory Applicant had obtained a previous order of constitutional invalidity in Satchwell v President of the Republic of South Africa and Another 2002 (6) SA 1 (CC) ; 2002 (9) BCLR 986 (CC). Applicant did not gain effective relief from that order due to promulgation of new legislation and regulations; applicant approaches Constitutional Court once again in this case.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account