| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:01:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:01:28Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2004-11-08 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2002] ZACC 1 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2003 (3) SA 345 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2003 (4) BCLR 357 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2157 | |
| dc.title | Phillips and Another v Director of Public Prosecutions Witwatersrand Local Division and Others | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT20-02 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT20/02 | en |
| dc.date.hearing | 29 August 2002 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Yacoob J Majority judgment | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Madala J dissenting judgment | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Ngcobo J separate judgment | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Sachs J separate judgment | |
| dc.date.judgment | 11 March 2003 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2157/Full%20judgment%20%28315%20Kb%29-AUTO.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Majority judgment by Yacoob J (with separate concurrences by Ngcobo J and Sachs J). Dissent by Madala J. Section 160(d) of the Liquor Act 21 of 1989 makes it an offence for the holder of an on-consumption licence to allow any person: (i) to perform an offensive, indecent or obscene act; or (ii) who is not clothed or not properly clothed, to perform or to appear, on a part of the licensed premises where entertainment of any nature is presented or to which the public has access. Though the State has a valid interest in reducing the negative consequences of liquor consumption, that interest cannot justify a sweeping curtailment of expression at all types of licensed premises, particularly not at licensed theatres, because these venues are crucial to the free exchange of ideas protected by the Constitution. Therefore the Court found the section to be unconstitutional. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Order of the High Court in Phillips v Director of Public Prosecutions 2002 (5) SA 556 (W) referred to Constitutional Court for confirmation in terms of s172(2). |