Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:01:27Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:01:27Z
dc.date.created 2003-11-12 en
dc.identifier.citation 2002] ZACC 31
dc.identifier.citation 2003 (2) BCLR 111 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2003 (2) SA 363 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2153
dc.title Bannatyne v Bannatyne (Commission for Gender Equality as Amicus Curiae) en
dc.title.alternative CCT18/02 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT18/02 en
dc.date.hearing 7 November 2002
dc.contributor.judge Mokgoro J
dc.date.judgment 20 December 2002
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2153/Full%20judgment%2020%20December%202002.pdf?sequence=14&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Unanimous judgment by Mokgoro J. Enforcement of Maintenance Court maintenance orders by High Courts is competent as appropriate relief and when carried out should seek to implement the best interests of the child principle. Courts should also bear in mind the systemic failures of the maintenance system.
dc.concourt.casehistory Constitutional Court granted special leave to appeal against a judgment and order of the Supreme Court of Appeal, setting aside a contempt order made by the High Court in Bannatyne v Bannatyne 2003(2) SA 359 (SCA).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account