Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:01:26Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:01:26Z
dc.date.created 2003-11-11 en
dc.identifier.citation [2002] ZACC 15
dc.identifier.citation 2002 (5) SA 721 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2002 (10) BCLR 1033 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2151
dc.title Minister of Health and Others v Treatment Action Campaign and Others (No 2) en
dc.title.alternative CCT8/02A en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT8/02A en
dc.date.hearing 2, 3 and 6 May 2002
dc.contributor.judge The Court
dc.date.judgment 5 July 2002
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2151/Full%20judgment%20%28554%20Kb%29-2378.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Concerned the public health care rights afforded to individuals under the Constitution and the state's obligation to take reasonable measures. Judgment by the Court confirms its obligation to review the state's actions in this regard. Two particular policies were challenged. One which provided Nevirapine to only two locations in the public health sector and for only 2 years and the other which stated that a comprehensive distribution of Nevirapine would only be considered after two years. The Court made a declaratory order defining these two infringements, and outlining the need to use the extra funds made available, to provide for the training of additional counsellors. An order requiring a report-back was not called for Judgment of the Court.
dc.concourt.casehistory Appeal against a decision and order of the High Court in Treatment Action Campaign and Others v Minister of Health and Others 2002 (4) BCLR 356 (T)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account