Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:01:26Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:01:26Z
dc.date.created 2003-11-11 en
dc.identifier.citation [2002] ZACC 16
dc.identifier.citation 2002 (5) SA 703 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2002 (10) BCLR 1075 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2150
dc.title Minister of Health and Others v Treatment Action Campaign and Others (No 1) en
dc.title.alternative CCT9/02 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT9/02 en
dc.date.hearing 3 April 2002
dc.contributor.judge The Court
dc.date.judgment 5 July 2002
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2150/Full%20judgment%20%28187%20Kb%29-13180.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Appeal of an interim putting-into-operation order. A decision by the Court finds that the lower court's interim execution order flowed from its powers under the Constitution and was delivered because of a finding that there was a violation of the Constitution. Therefore the Court reasons that this does constitute a constitutional matter. The decision then discusses whether it is in the interests of justice to hear the appeal, finding it does not. The Court finds that the appealing party has to show that irreparable harm will flow if the appeal is not heard.
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against an interim execution order in Treatment Action Campaign and Others v Minister of Health and Others 2002 (4) BCLR 356 (T)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account