Show simple item record 2017-04-08T17:00:55Z 2017-04-08T17:00:55Z 2004-01-22 en
dc.identifier.citation [2001] ZACC 7
dc.identifier.citation 2002 (2) BCLR 133 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2002 (3) SA 1 (CC)
dc.title Member of the Executive Council for Local Government and Development Planning, Western Cape v Paarl Poultry Enterprises en
dc.title.alternative CCT38/01 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT38/01 en 6 November 2001
dc.contributor.judge Yacoob J 14 December 2001
dc.concourt.synopsis Validity of s 10 of Proclamation 52 which purported to validate all decisions and actions of district councils retrospectively from 1 July 1997 to cover the period during which these councils had been "improperly elected" according to the High Court judgment. Court held that s 10 of the Local Government Transition Act 209 of 1993 conferred wide powers in respect of local restructuring of provincial MECs. The failure to enact new regulatory framework did not result in district councils becoming unlawfully constituted. Dismissed the respondent application for declaratory relief and referred the matter back to the High Court to be dealt with in light of the judgment. Yaccob J for unanimous Court.
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal directly to Constitutional Court against a judgment of Cape High Court in Winelands District Council v Paarl Poultry Enterprises CC t/a Rosendal Poultry Farm and Another Case number 3519/1998, unreported (C)

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


My Account