Show simple item record 2017-04-08T17:00:54Z 2017-04-08T17:00:54Z 2003-10-30 en
dc.identifier.citation [2002] ZACC 18; 2002 (6) SA 1 (CC); 2002 (9) BCLR 986 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2002 (6) SA 1 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2002 (9) BCLR 986 (CC)
dc.title Satchwell v President of the Republic of South Africa and Another en
dc.title.alternative CCT45/01 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT45/01 en 26 February 2002
dc.contributor.judge Madala J 25 July 2002
dc.concourt.synopsis Constitutionality of ss 8 and 9 of the Judges Remuneration and Conditions of Services Act which give benefits to the spouses of judges but not their same sex life partners. Madala J in a unanimous decision found that benefits should be afforded to same sex partners of judges where reciprocal duties entailed in a marriage can be shown in the same sex relationship. The Court ordered ss 8 and 9 to be read as applying to same sex partners with the above mentioned qualification.
dc.concourt.casehistory Satchwell v President of the RSA and Another 2001 (12) BCLR 1284 (T) reversed on appeal.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


My Account