Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:00:53Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:00:53Z
dc.date.created 2004-01-21 en
dc.identifier.citation [2001] ZACC 12
dc.identifier.citation 2002 (1) SA 1 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2001 (11) BCLR 1137 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2140
dc.title Minister of Defence v Potsane and Another en
dc.title.alternative CCT14/01 en
dc.title.alternative CCT29/01
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT14/01 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT29/01
dc.date.hearing 23 August 2001
dc.contributor.judge Kriegler J
dc.date.judgment 5 October 2001
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2140/Full%20judgment%20%28306%20Kb%29-1028.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis The first case (Potsane) is an appeal by the Minister of Defence against judgment and order by Ramphai J in the Free State High Court upholding a constitutional challenge to an aspect of disciplinary proceedings in a military court. The High Court declared some provisions of the Military Discipline Supplementary Measures Act of 1999 to be inconsistent with section 179 and equality clause of the Constitution. The other case (Legal Soldier) is an application for direct access presenting a similar challenge. The challenged provisions were found to be constitutional and appeal by the Minister of Defence accordingly upheld. Application for direct access in Legal Soldier refused-no prospect of success. Kriegler J wrote for unanimous Court.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account