| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:00:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:00:51Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2003-12-02 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2001] ZACC 18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2001 (3) SA 893 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2001 (7) BCLR 685 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2133 | |
| dc.title | Mohamed and Another v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT17/01 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT17/01 | en |
| dc.date.hearing | 10 May 2001 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | The Court | |
| dc.date.judgment | 28 May 2001 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2133/Full%20judgment%20%28226%20Kb%29-808.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | pplicant, a Tanzanian citizen wanted in the US, was handed over to the FBI by the SA government, removed from the country and put on trial in New York without an undertaking first being obtained that he would not be subject to the death penalty should he be found guilty. The court affirmed the finding in Makwanyane that the death penalty is unconstitutional and this meant that the SA government could not expose a person to the risk of execution, regardless of consent. Held that applicant was illegally removed from the country. The Director of the Court was directed to urgently draw the judgment to the attention of the trial court in New York. Maj: the Court. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Urgent application for leave to appeal against a judgment of Cape of Good Hope High Court. |