dc.date.accessioned |
2017-04-08T17:00:47Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-04-08T17:00:47Z |
|
dc.date.created |
2003-11-25 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
[2002] ZACC 3 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
2002 (4) SA 294 (CC) |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
2002 (5) BCLR 433 (CC) |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2127 |
|
dc.title |
Islamic Unity Convention v Independent Broadcasting Authority and Others |
en |
dc.title.alternative |
CCT36/01 |
en |
dc.identifier.casenumber |
CCT36/01 |
en |
dc.date.hearing |
22 November 2001 |
|
dc.contributor.judge |
Langa DCJ |
|
dc.date.judgment |
11 April 2002 |
|
dc.link.judgment |
http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2127/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2011%20April%202002.pdf?sequence=18&isAllowed=y |
|
dc.concourt.synopsis |
Application for leave to appeal directly to the Constitutional Court against the High Court's refusal to deal with constitutionality of clause 2(a) of the Code of Conduct for Broadcasting Services. In a unanimous judgment Langa DCJ held that the High Court had erred in approaching the prayer for constitutional invalidity as if it were a prayer for discretionary relief in terms of s 19(a)(iii) of the Supreme Court of Appeal. The relevant portion of clause 2(a) prohibited speech that was "likely to prejudice relations between sections of the population". Clause 2(a) limited the right to freedom of expression and is therefore unconstitutional. The prohibition was overbroad. |
|
dc.concourt.casehistory |
Application for direct leave to appeal to the Constitutional Court after Witwatersrand High Court refused to consider an application for a declaration of constitutional invalidity. |
|