Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:59:49Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:59:49Z
dc.date.created 2004-01-28 en
dc.identifier.citation [2000] ZACC 28
dc.identifier.citation 2001 (2) SA 388 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2001 (2) BCLR 133 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2120
dc.title Prince v President Cape Law Society and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT36/00A en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT36/00A en
dc.date.hearing 16 November 2000
dc.contributor.judge Ngcobo J
dc.date.judgment 12 December 2000
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2120/Full%20judgment%20%28253%20Kb%29-1250.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Rastafarian applicant alleging that criminal prohibition on use and possession of cannabis infringed the right to freely practice his religion. The court requested the parties to submit further evidence on affidavit as to the justifiability of the limitation. Section 12(1)(b) of Supreme Court Act 59 of 1959 (quorum of SCA judges when considering the validity of an Act of Parliament) declared inconsistent with the interim Constitution and invalid from 27 April 1994. Maj: Ngcobo J (unanimous).
dc.concourt.casehistory Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Prince v President Cape Law Society 2000 (3) SA 845 (SCA) ; 2000 (7) BCLR 823 (SCA), dismissing an appeal against the decision of the High Court in Prince v President Cape Law Society 1998 (8) BCLR 976 (C), Constitutional Court granted leave to deliver further evidence.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account