Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:59:49Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:59:49Z
dc.date.created 2004-01-23 en
dc.identifier.citation [2001] ZACC 2
dc.identifier.citation 2001 (4) SA 1288 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2001 (8) BCLR 765 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2119
dc.title Women's Legal Centre, Ex parte: In re Moise v Greater Germiston Transitional Local Council en
dc.title.alternative CCT54/00/1 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT54/00/1 en
dc.contributor.judge Kriegler J
dc.date.judgment 21 September 2001
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/handle/20.500.12144/2119?show=full
dc.concourt.synopsis Application for a variation of order of this Court. Order to have an added provision making the order in question to apply retrospectively. It was alleged that the absence of such a provision was a "patent error or omission". The Court held per Kriegler J that there was no need for any addition to the order. Application for variation of the order refused.
dc.concourt.casehistory Constitutional Court confirmed an order made in the Witwatersrand High Court in: Moise v Greater Germiston Transitional Local Council: Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development Intervening (Women's Legal Centre as Amicus Curiae) 2001 (4) SA 491 (CC). This case concerns an application for the variation of the order made by the Constitutional Court.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account