Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:59:47Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:59:47Z
dc.date.created 2003-12-11 en
dc.identifier.citation [2001] ZACC 21
dc.identifier.citation 2001 (4) SA 491 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2001 (8) BCLR 765 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2115
dc.title Moise v Greater Germiston Transitional Local Council: Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development Intervening en
dc.title.alternative CCT54/00 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT54/00 en
dc.date.hearing 16 May 2001
dc.contributor.judge Somyalo AJ
dc.date.judgment 4 July 2001
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2115/Full%20Judgment%20%28192%20Kb%29-3229.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Constitutional invalidity of section 2(1)(a) of the Limitation of Legal Proceedings (Provincial and Local Authorities) Act 94 of 1970 confirmed. Somyalo AJ found that the section, which obliges plaintiffs wishing to sue an administration, local authority or any of its officers for damages for a wrongful act, to serve a written notice on the defendant within ninety days of the cause of action arising, constituted a material limitation of section 34 and could not be justified under section 36 of the Constitution.
dc.concourt.casehistory Constitutional Court confirmed an earlier order made by the Witwatersrand High Court. In later case Ex parte Women's Legal Centre: In re Moise v Greater Germiston Transitional Council 2001 (4) SA 1288 (CC) application is made for a variation of the order made in this case.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account