Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:58:50Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:58:50Z
dc.date.created 2004-09-29 en
dc.identifier.citation [2000] ZACC 29
dc.identifier.citation 2000 (2) SA 825 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2000 (1) SACR 300 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2000 (5) BCLR 478 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2069
dc.title Harksen v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT41/99 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT41/99 en
dc.date.hearing 2 March 2000
dc.contributor.judge Goldstone J
dc.date.judgment 30 March 2000
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2069/Full%20judgment%20%28210%20Kb%29-1472.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Constitutionality of section 3(2) of the Extradition Act 67 of 1962 considered, in so far as the President's consent to extradition proceedings commencing gave rise to an international agreement which required the approval of or tabling before Parliament. Goldstone J for a unanimous Court dismissed the appeal.
dc.concourt.casehistory Appeal from a part of a decison of the Cape High Court in S v Harksen; Harksen v President of the Republic of South Africa; Harksen v Wagner NO and another 2000 (1) SA 1155 (C), appeal dismissed.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account