| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T16:58:50Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T16:58:50Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2004-09-29 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2000] ZACC 29 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2000 (2) SA 825 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2000 (1) SACR 300 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2000 (5) BCLR 478 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2069 | |
| dc.title | Harksen v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT41/99 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT41/99 | en |
| dc.date.hearing | 2 March 2000 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Goldstone J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 30 March 2000 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2069/Full%20judgment%20%28210%20Kb%29-1472.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Constitutionality of section 3(2) of the Extradition Act 67 of 1962 considered, in so far as the President's consent to extradition proceedings commencing gave rise to an international agreement which required the approval of or tabling before Parliament. Goldstone J for a unanimous Court dismissed the appeal. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Appeal from a part of a decison of the Cape High Court in S v Harksen; Harksen v President of the Republic of South Africa; Harksen v Wagner NO and another 2000 (1) SA 1155 (C), appeal dismissed. |