| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T16:58:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T16:58:07Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2004-10-19 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1998] ZACC 3 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1998 (2) SA 1143 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1998 (4) BCLR 415 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2061 | |
| dc.title | Bruce and Another v Fleecytex Johannesburg CC and Others | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT1/98 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT1/98 | en |
| dc.date.hearing | ||
| dc.contributor.judge | Chaskalson P | |
| dc.date.judgment | 24 March 1998 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2061/Full%20judgment%20%28159%20Kb%29-2099.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Application for direct access to Constitutional Court to challenge constitutional validity of section 150(3) of Insolvency Act. Application refused in unanimous judgment by Chaskalson P. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | The High Court dismissed an urgent application by the applicant for an interdict restraining the winding-up of its estate, applicant subsequently applied for direct access to the Constitutional Court, application refused. |