Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:58:07Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:58:07Z
dc.date.created 2004-10-19 en
dc.identifier.citation [1998] ZACC 3
dc.identifier.citation 1998 (2) SA 1143 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 1998 (4) BCLR 415 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2061
dc.title Bruce and Another v Fleecytex Johannesburg CC and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT1/98 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT1/98 en
dc.date.hearing
dc.contributor.judge Chaskalson P
dc.date.judgment 24 March 1998
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2061/Full%20judgment%20%28159%20Kb%29-2099.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Application for direct access to Constitutional Court to challenge constitutional validity of section 150(3) of Insolvency Act. Application refused in unanimous judgment by Chaskalson P.
dc.concourt.casehistory The High Court dismissed an urgent application by the applicant for an interdict restraining the winding-up of its estate, applicant subsequently applied for direct access to the Constitutional Court, application refused.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account