- ConCourt Collections Home
- →
- Constitutional Court Cases & Judgments
- →
- Archive
- →
- 1997
- →
- View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T16:57:27Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T16:57:27Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2004-10-19 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1998] ZACC 5 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1998 (3) SA 695 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1998 (6) BCLR 656 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2045 | |
| dc.title | Wild and Another v Hoffert NO and Others | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT28/97 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT28/97 | en |
| dc.date.hearing | 10 March 1998 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Kriegler J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 12 May 1998 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2045/Full%20judgment%20%28228%20Kb%29-2093.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Appeal against decision of Natal High Court in which applicants were refused constitutional relief for unreasonable delay before trial. Appeal dismissed, on basis that assuming there had been unreasonable delay, the relief prayed for (permanent stay of prosecution) was inappropriate because no evidence of trial-related prejudice or other extraordinary circumstances. Unanimous judgment written by Kriegler J. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Appeal against part of a judgment of the High Court in Wild and Another v Hoffert NO and Others 1997 (7) BCLR 974 (N) ; 1997 (2) SACR 233 (N), appeal dismissed. |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
1997 [18]