Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:57:26Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:57:26Z
dc.date.created 2004-10-19 en
dc.identifier.citation [1998] ZACC 10
dc.identifier.citation 1998 (4) SA 1127 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 1998 (7) BCLR 880 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2042
dc.title Mistry v Interim National Medical and Dental Council of South Africa and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT13/97 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT13/97 en
dc.date.hearing 24 February 1998
dc.contributor.judge Sachs J Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge Chaskalson P separate judgment
dc.date.judgment 29 May 1998
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2042/Full%20judgment%20%28457%20Kb%29-2082.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Right to privacy. Challenge to the search and seizure powers given to inspectors by section 28(1) of the Medicines and Related Substances Control Act 101 of 1965 on basis that the provision is inconsistent with section 13 of the interim Constitution. Unanimous judgment by Sachs J and separate concurring judgment by Chaskalson P on procedural matters.
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal agaist the decision of the High Court in Mistry v Interim National Medical and Dental Council of South Africa and Others 1997 (7) BCLR 933 (D), the merits of the appeal being heard simultaneously and a referral to the Constitutional Court regarding the constitutional validity of section 28(1) of Act 101 of 1965, application for leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed, section 28(1) declared unconstitutional.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account