Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:57:26Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:57:26Z
dc.date.created 2004-10-05 en
dc.identifier.citation [1997] ZACC 12
dc.identifier.citation 1997 (11) BCLR 1489 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 1998 (1) SA 300 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2036
dc.title Harksen v Lane NO and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT9/97 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT9/97 en
dc.date.hearing 26 August 1997
dc.contributor.judge Goldstone J Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge O'Regan J dissenting judgment
dc.contributor.judge Sachs J dissenting judgment
dc.date.judgment 7 October 1997
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2036/Full%20judgment%20%28289%20Kb%29-1610.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Application for declaration of constitutional invalidity of section 21 and parts of sections 64(2) and 65(1) of the Insolvency Act, 1936, on the basis of property and equality. Referred by Cape of Good Hope Provincial High Court. Majority (written by Goldstone J) held that legislation not unconstitutional. Dissents by O'Regan J and Sachs J.
dc.concourt.casehistory Adjudication of a referral by the High Court in Harksen v Lane and Others (CPD, Case No 16552/96, unreported) to the Constitutional Court, regarding the constitutionality of certain sections of Act 24 of 1936, declaration of constitutional validity.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account