Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:56:49Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:56:49Z
dc.date.created 2004-11-30 en
dc.identifier.citation [1996] ZACC 22
dc.identifier.citation 1996 (12) BCLR 1573 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 1997 (2) SA 621 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2028
dc.title Transvaal Agricultural Union v Minister of Land Affairs and Another en
dc.title.alternative CCT21/96 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT21/96 en
dc.date.hearing 19 September 1996
dc.contributor.judge Chaskalson P
dc.date.judgment 18 November 1996
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2028/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2018%20November%201996.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Application for direct access in terms of rule 17 read with s100(2) of the Constitution. Applicant sought an order declaring various sections of the Restitution of Land Rights Act and two rules of procedure of the Land Claims Commission unconstitutional. Application for direct access refused (no exceptional circumstances) and applicant had approached Court prematurely. Applicant ordered to pay costs of abortive proceedings.
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for direct access to the Constitutional Court, direct access denied.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account