S v Lawrence; S v Negal; S v Solberg

dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-08T16:56:47Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-08T16:56:47Z
dc.date.created	2004-10-04	en
dc.identifier.citation	[1997] ZACC 11
dc.identifier.citation	1997 (10) BCLR 1348 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	1997 (4) SA 1176 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2019
dc.title	S v Lawrence; S v Negal; S v Solberg	en
dc.title.alternative	CCT38/96; CCT39/96; CCT40/96	en
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT38/96	en
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT39/96
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT40/96
dc.date.hearing	6 May 1997
dc.contributor.judge	Chaskalson P Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge	Sachs J separate judgment
dc.contributor.judge	O'Regan J dissenting judgment
dc.date.judgment	6 October 1997
dc.link.judgment	http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2019/Full%20judgment%20%28804%20Kb%29-1614.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis	Appeal from criminal convictions in terms of the Liquor Act, 1989. Sections regulating times and days of sales by grocers, and type of alcoholic beverage grocers can sell, challenged on the basis of freedom of economic activity and, in relation to closed days, freedom of religion. Appeals dismissed by majority (judgment by Chaskalson P). Dissent by O'Regan J, and separate concurring judgment by Sachs J.
dc.concourt.casehistory	Appellants were convicted in the Magistrates Court. The High Court dismissed their appeals. This is an appeal from the decision of the High Court, appeal dismissed. A Look Inside: Full judgment (804Kb)

Files in this item

Summary of judgment-1581.pdf ( 22.34Kb )

Full judgment (804 Kb)-1614.pdf ( 804.0Kb )