Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:56:19Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:56:19Z
dc.date.created 2004-12-03 en
dc.identifier.citation [1995] ZACC 14
dc.identifier.citation 1996 (1) BCLR 141 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 1996 (1) SA 1207 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2010
dc.title S v Ntuli en
dc.title.alternative CCT17/95 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT17/95 en
dc.date.hearing 24 August 1995
dc.contributor.judge Didcott J
dc.date.judgment 8 December 1995
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2010/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%208%20December%201995.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Limitation of a prisoner's right to prosecute an appeal in person by s 309(4) and s 305 of the Criminal Procedure Act. Maj: Didcott J (unanimous).
dc.concourt.casehistory Adjudication of a mero motu referral to the Constitutional Court by the High Court, regarding the constitutionality of s 309(4)(a) read with s 305 of Act 51 of 1977, the sections held to be unconstitutional.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account