Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:56:18Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:56:18Z
dc.date.created 2004-12-01 en
dc.identifier.citation [1996] ZACC 20
dc.identifier.citation 1996 (12) BCLR 1559 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 1997 (1) SA 124 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2003
dc.title Mohlomi v Minister of Defence en
dc.title.alternative CCT41/95 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT41/95 en
dc.date.hearing 21 November 1995
dc.contributor.judge Didcott J
dc.date.judgment 26 September 1996
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2003/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2026%20September%201996.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Section 113(1) of the Defence Act 44 of 1957, which requires a plaintiff to institute action versus the state within six months and requires plaintiff to give written notice thereof at least one month before commencement of action, held in breach of s22 of the Constitution and invalid. Maj: Didcott J (unanimous).
dc.concourt.casehistory Adjudication of a referral to the Constitutional Court by the High Court regarding the constitutionality of s 113(1) of Act 44 of 1957, s 113(1) declared unconstitutional.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account