Bernstein and Others v Bester NO and Others

dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-08T16:56:18Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-08T16:56:18Z
dc.date.created	2004-11-30	en
dc.identifier.citation	[1996] ZACC 2
dc.identifier.citation	1996 (4) BCLR 449 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	1996 (2) SA 751 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/1997
dc.title	Bernstein and Others v Bester NO and Others	en
dc.title.alternative	CCT23/95	en
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT23/95	en
dc.date.hearing	19 September 1995
dc.contributor.judge	Ackermann J Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge	Kriegler J separate judgment
dc.contributor.judge	O'Regan J separate judgment
dc.date.judgment	27 March 1996
dc.link.judgment	https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/1997/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2027%20March%201996.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.casehistory	Adjudication of a referral to the Constitutional Court by the High Court regarding the constitutionality of ss 417 and 418 of Act 61 of 1973.
dc.concourt.casehistory	Examination of any person as to the affairs of a company in the course of winding-up in terms of s417 and s418 of the Companies Act Maj: Ackermann J (conc: Chaskalson P, Mahomed DP, Madala J, Langa J, Mokgoro J, Sachs J, Ngoepe AJ) Separate concurrences by Kriegler J (concurring Didcott J), O'Regan J.

Files in this item

Full judgment Official version 27 March 1996.pdf ( 861.7Kb )

Full judgment (Word format) 27 March 1996.doc ( 335.5Kb )

Summary of judgment.pdf ( 20.13Kb )

Applicants' Heads of Argument.pdf ( 1.430Mb )

Respondents' Heads of Argument.pdf ( 2.715Mb )

01Referral to Constitutional Court on agreed facts.pdf ( 634.5Kb )

02Notice of Referral ito Rule 22.pdf ( 87.47Kb )

03Reasons ito Rule 22.pdf ( 57.48Kb )