Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:56:17Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:56:17Z
dc.date.created 2004-11-30 en
dc.identifier.citation [1996] ZACC 10
dc.identifier.citation 1996 (3) SA 850 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 1996 (5) BCLR 658 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/1993
dc.title Du Plessis and Others v De Klerk and Another en
dc.title.alternative CCT8/95 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT8/95 en
dc.date.hearing 7 November 1995
dc.contributor.judge Kentridge AJ Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge Mahomed DP separate judgment
dc.contributor.judge Ackermann J separate judgment
dc.contributor.judge Kriegler J dissenting judgment
dc.contributor.judge Madala J separate judgment
dc.contributor.judge Mokgoro J separate judgment
dc.contributor.judge Sachs J separate judgment
dc.date.judgment 15 May 1996
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/1993/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2015%20May%201996.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Law of defamation. Retrospective application of Constitution and application of Ch 3 to legal relationships between private parties. Interpretation of s 35(3) Maj: Kentridge AJ (concurring: Chaskalson P, Langa J, O'Regan J) Separate concurrences by Mahomed DP (concurring Langa J, O'Regan J), Ackermann J, Madala J, Mokgoro J, Sachs J Dissent: Kriegler J (concurring Didcott J).
dc.concourt.casehistory Appeal from a decison of the High Court in De Klerk and Another v Du Plessis and Others 1995 (2) SA 40 (T) ; 1994 (6) BCLR 124 (T), and adjudication of a referral to the Constitutional Court by the High Court in the same matter, appeal dismissed.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account