Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:55:35Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:55:35Z
dc.date.created 2004-11-30 en
dc.identifier.citation [1996] ZACC 11
dc.identifier.citation 1996 (6) BCLR 775 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 1996 (4) SA 337 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/1985
dc.title Gardener v Whitaker en
dc.title.alternative CCT26/94 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT26/94 en
dc.date.hearing 15 November 1995
dc.contributor.judge Kentridge AJ
dc.date.judgment 15 May 1996
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/1985/Full%20judgmnent%20Official%20version%2015%20May%201996.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for Leave to Appeal against a decision of the High Court in Gardener v Whitaker 1995 (2) SA 672 (E) ; 1994 (4) BCLR 836 (E). Application dismissed.
dc.concourt.casehistory Law of defamation. Application of constitution to development of common law. Interpretation of s35(3) of the Constitution. Role of Supreme Court and Appellate Division A unanimous judgment written by Kentridge AJ.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account