Key v Attorney-General Cape Provincial Division and Another

dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-08T16:55:35Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-08T16:55:35Z
dc.date.created	2004-11-30	en
dc.identifier.citation	[1996] ZACC 25
dc.identifier.citation	1996 (4) SA 187 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	1996 (6) BCLR 788 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/1984
dc.title	Key v Attorney-General Cape Provincial Division and Another	en
dc.title.alternative	CCT21/94	en
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT21/94	en
dc.date.hearing	23 May 1995
dc.contributor.judge	Kriegler J
dc.date.judgment	15 May 1996
dc.link.judgment	https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/1984/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2015%20May%201996.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis	Sections 6 and 7 of the Serious Economic Offences Act. (Search and seizure, Tollgate) Use of derivative evidence. Distinction between constitutionality and admissibility. S 25(3) of the Constitution. Maj: Kriegler J (unanimous).
dc.concourt.casehistory	Adjudication of a referral to the Constitutional Court by the High Court regarding the constitutionality of ss 6 and 7 of Act 117 of 1991 ; Constitution declared not to be applicable.

Files in this item

Full judgment Official version 15 May 1996.pdf ( 30.46Kb )

Full judgment (Word format) 15 May 1996.rtf ( 57.55Kb )

Summary of judgment.pdf ( 18.18Kb )

Summary of judgment.doc ( 29.5Kb )

Directions 8 March 1995.pdf ( 46.38Kb )

Directions 9 November 1994.pdf ( 92.55Kb )

Cape Provincial Divison judgment 30 August 1994.pdf ( 87.79Kb )

Cape Provincial Division order 30 August 1994.pdf ( 40.71Kb )

Applicant's Heads of Argument.pdf ( 1.997Mb )

01Notice of Motion.pdf ( 142.4Kb )

02Founding Affidavit.pdf ( 1.230Mb )