Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:55:34Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:55:34Z
dc.date.created 2004-10-04 en
dc.identifier.citation [1995] ZACC 1
dc.identifier.citation 1995 (2) SA 642 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 1995 (1) SACR 568 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 1995 (4) BCLR 401 (SA)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/1980
dc.title S v Zuma and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT5/94 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT5/94 en
dc.date.hearing 6 March 1995
dc.contributor.judge Kentridge AJ
dc.date.judgment 5 April 1995
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/1980/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%205%20April%201995.pdf?sequence=20&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Presumption relating to the admissibility of confessions in s 217(1)(b)(ii) of the Criminal Procedure Act Maj: Kentridge AJ(unanimous).
dc.concourt.casehistory A referral to the Constitutional Court by the High Court regarding the constitutionality of s 217(1)(b)(ii) of Act 51 of 1977. Referral held to be incompetent but direct access granted by Constitutional Court, s 217(1)(b)(ii) declared unconstitutional.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account