Implied provisions in contracts : is there to be a new role for the hypothetical bystander? Conflicting Supreme Court of Appeal decisions

Authors :

Kerr, A J

Journal Title :

South African Law Journal

Citation :

(2006) 123 SALJ 195

S.A. Cases Cited :

Consol Ltd t/a Consol Glass v Twee Jonge Gezellen (Pty) Ltd & Another 2005 (6) SA 1 (SCA)

Seven Eleven Corporation of SA (Pty) Ltd v Cancun Trading NO 150 CC 2005 (5) SA 186 (SCA)

Transnet Ltd v Rubinstein 2006 (1) SA 591 (SCA)

Subject :

Contract - Interpretation and construction

South Africa. Supreme Court of Appeal

This item appears in the following Collection(s)