Women's Legal Centre, Ex parte: In re Moise v Greater Germiston Transitional Local Council

dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-08T16:59:49Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-08T16:59:49Z
dc.date.created	2004-01-23	en
dc.identifier.citation	[2001] ZACC 2
dc.identifier.citation	2001 (4) SA 1288 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	2001 (8) BCLR 765 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2119
dc.title	Women's Legal Centre, Ex parte: In re Moise v Greater Germiston Transitional Local Council	en
dc.title.alternative	CCT54/00/1	en
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT54/00/1	en
dc.contributor.judge	Kriegler J
dc.date.judgment	21 September 2001
dc.link.judgment	http://collections.concourt.org.za/handle/20.500.12144/2119?show=full
dc.concourt.synopsis	Application for a variation of order of this Court. Order to have an added provision making the order in question to apply retrospectively. It was alleged that the absence of such a provision was a "patent error or omission". The Court held per Kriegler J that there was no need for any addition to the order. Application for variation of the order refused.
dc.concourt.casehistory	Constitutional Court confirmed an order made in the Witwatersrand High Court in: Moise v Greater Germiston Transitional Local Council: Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development Intervening (Women's Legal Centre as Amicus Curiae) 2001 (4) SA 491 (CC). This case concerns an application for the variation of the order made by the Constitutional Court.

Files in this item

Notice of Motion-938.pdf ( 64.57Kb )

Founding Affidavit-939.pdf ( 76.18Kb )

Amicus Curiae Heads of Argument-937.pdf ( 218.6Kb )

Full Judgment (22Kb)-3175.pdf ( 21.90Kb )