Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:57:27Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:57:27Z
dc.date.created 2004-10-19 en
dc.identifier.citation [1998] ZACC 14
dc.identifier.citation 1998 (4) SA 1224 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 1998 (11) BCLR 1362 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2047
dc.title Osman and Another v Attorney-General Transvaal en
dc.title.alternative CCT37/97 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT37/97 en
dc.date.hearing 7 May 1998
dc.contributor.judge Madala J
dc.date.judgment 23 September 1998
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/handle/20.500.12144/2047?show=full
dc.concourt.synopsis The right to remain silent and the right not to make a self-incriminating statement. Appeal against the judgment of the Transvaal High Court, challenging the constitutionality of section 36 of the General Law Amendment Act 62 of 1955 on the basis that it is inconsistent with section 25(2)(c) and section 25(3)(c) of the Interim Constitution. Appeal dismissed in unanimous judgment by Madala J.
dc.concourt.casehistory Appeal against the decision of the High Court in Osman and Another v Attorney-General, Transvaal 1998 (2) BCLR 165 (T) ; 1998 (1) SACR 28 (T), declaring section 36 of the General Law Amendment Act 62 of 1955 constitutionally valid, appeal dismissed.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account